Torna alla ricerca
Trib.Torino, 3.11.2025, est. La Manna (ordinanza), ASGI, CGIL Piemonte, SUNIA Torino, SICET Piemonte (avv. Guariso, Lavanna, Neri) c. Regione Piemonte (avv. Scisciot) e Agenzia territoriale per la casa del Piemonte Centrale (avv. Bongioanni).
| | |Accesso agli alloggi pubblici – cittadini extra UE – art. 40, c. 6. TU Immigrazione e art.3, c.1, lett. a) L.R. n. 3/2010 - requisito dello svolgimento di attività lavorativa – contrasto con l’art. 3 Cost. e con il diritto UE – sussistenza – questione di costituzionalità – art.8, c.1, lett. t-bis L. Reg. Piemonte n.3/2010 – attribuzione di punteggio per la mera residenza storica, a prescindere dal bisogno – contrasto con l’art. 3 Cost. – sussistenza – questione di costituzionalità.
Devono ritenersi rilevanti e non manifestamente infondate le seguenti questioni di costituzionalità: a) dell’art.40, c. 6, TU immigrazione e dell’art. 3, c.1, lett.a) L.Reg.Piemonte n.3/2010, nella parte in cui limitano l’accesso agli alloggi di edilizia residenziale pubblica ai cittadini di paesi extra UE che esercitano una regolare attività di lavoro subordinato o autonomo, per contrasto con gli artt.3 e 117 Cost. , quest’ultimo in relazione all’art. 12, par. 1, lett. g) direttiva 2011/98/UE e all’art. 34 CDFUE, dell’art.11, par.1, lett. f) direttiva 2003/109/CE; b) dell’art. 8, c. 1, lett. t-bis) L.Reg.Piemonte n.3/2010 nella parte in cui prevede che i bandi di assegnazione degli alloggi di edilizia residenziale pubblica prevedano l’attribuzione di un punteggio per la residenza storica nel territorio regionale superiore a 15, 20 o 25 anni.
Access to public housing – non-EU citizens – Art. 40(6) Consolidated Immigration Act and Art. 3(1)(a) Regional Law No. 3/2010 – requirement of carrying out employment activity – conflict with Art. 3 of the Constitution and with EU law – existence – question of constitutionality – Art. 8(1)(t-bis) Regional Law of Piedmont No. 3/2010 – attribution of a score for mere length of residence, regardless of need – conflict with Art. 3 of the Constitution – existence – question of constitutionality.
The following questions of constitutionality must be considered relevant and not manifestly unfounded:
a) concerning Art. 40(6) of the Consolidated Immigration Act and Art. 3(1)(a) of Regional Law of Piedmont No. 3/2010, insofar as they limit access to public residential housing to citizens of non-EU countries who carry out a regular activity of subordinate or self-employed work, in contrast with Arts. 3 and 117 of the Constitution, the latter in relation to Art. 12(1)(g) of Directive 2011/98/EU and Art. 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and to Art. 11(1)(f) of Directive 2003/109/EC; b) concerning Art. 8(1)(t-bis) of Regional Law of Piedmont No. 3/2010, insofar as it provides that the calls for the allocation of public residential housing must include the attribution of a score for long-term residence in the regional territory exceeding 15, 20, or 25 years.
a) concerning Art. 40(6) of the Consolidated Immigration Act and Art. 3(1)(a) of Regional Law of Piedmont No. 3/2010, insofar as they limit access to public residential housing to citizens of non-EU countries who carry out a regular activity of subordinate or self-employed work, in contrast with Arts. 3 and 117 of the Constitution, the latter in relation to Art. 12(1)(g) of Directive 2011/98/EU and Art. 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and to Art. 11(1)(f) of Directive 2003/109/EC; b) concerning Art. 8(1)(t-bis) of Regional Law of Piedmont No. 3/2010, insofar as it provides that the calls for the allocation of public residential housing must include the attribution of a score for long-term residence in the regional territory exceeding 15, 20, or 25 years.