Torna alla ricerca
Trib.Padova, 02.01.2025, est. Stocco, ASGI, Razzismo Stop, Sunia e altri (avv.ti Ferrero, Guariso, Marchioro, Mason, Prete, Roverso, Zappia) c. Regione Veneto (avv. Munari) e Comune di Venezia (avv.ti Iannotta, Ongaro, Trento)
| | |Discriminazione per nazionalità – accesso alla edilizia residenziale pubblica – requisito di cinque anni di residenza nella Regione – dichiarazione di incostituzionalità – ordine di modifica del connesso regolamento – ammissibilità – attribuzione di punteggio sulla base della residenza pregressa – irragionevolezza ed effetti discriminatori – ordine di modifica anche di tale clasuola – ammissibilità – diritto al risarcimento del danno delle associazioni a tutela dei migranti – sussistenza
Una volta che il requisito di cinque anni di pregressa residenza per l’accesso agli alloggi pubblici sia dichiarato incostituzionale (come accaduto, per la Regione Veneto, con la sentenza 67/2024) nulla osta a che il Giudice ordinario, nell’ambito di un giudizio ex art. 28 dlgs 150/2011, ordini alla Regione la modifica del regolamento regionale che mantiene la previsione di detto requisito in quanto discriminatorio nei confronti dei cittadini stranieri; parimenti il giudice ordinario può ordinare la modifica di detto regolamento nella parte in cui attribuisce, nella formazione della graduatoria, un punteggio sproporzionato alla durata della residenza pregressa, tale da prevalere rispetto alla considerazione del bisogno; le associazioni che hanno promosso il giudizio su tali punti hanno diritto al risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale per la lesione verificatasi nel periodo di vigenza delle norme.
Discrimination on grounds of nationality - access to public housing - requirement of five years\' residence in the Region - declaration of unconstitutionality - order for amendment of the relevant regulation - admissibility - award of points on the basis of past residence - unreasonableness and discriminatory effects - order for amendment of that clause as well - admissibility - right to compensation for damage for associations for the protection of migrants - existence
Once the requirement of five years\' previous residence for access to public housing is declared unconstitutional (as happened, in the case of the Veneto Region, with sentence 67/2024), there is nothing to prevent the ordinary court, in the context of a case pursuant to art. 28 dlgs 150/2011, orders the Region to amend the regional regulation that maintains the provision of that requirement as discriminatory against foreign citizens; likewise, the ordinary judge may order the amendment of that regulation in the part in which it attributes, in the formation of the ranking list, a disproportionate score to the duration of previous residence, such as to prevail over consideration of need; the associations that have brought proceedings on these points are entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage for the harm that occurred during the period in which the regulations were in force.
Discrimination on grounds of nationality - access to public housing - requirement of five years\' residence in the Region - declaration of unconstitutionality - order for amendment of the relevant regulation - admissibility - award of points on the basis of past residence - unreasonableness and discriminatory effects - order for amendment of that clause as well - admissibility - right to compensation for damage for associations for the protection of migrants - existence
Once the requirement of five years\' previous residence for access to public housing is declared unconstitutional (as happened, in the case of the Veneto Region, with sentence 67/2024), there is nothing to prevent the ordinary court, in the context of a case pursuant to art. 28 dlgs 150/2011, orders the Region to amend the regional regulation that maintains the provision of that requirement as discriminatory against foreign citizens; likewise, the ordinary judge may order the amendment of that regulation in the part in which it attributes, in the formation of the ranking list, a disproportionate score to the duration of previous residence, such as to prevail over consideration of need; the associations that have brought proceedings on these points are entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage for the harm that occurred during the period in which the regulations were in force.