Torna alla ricerca
Trib. Firenze, sez. IV, 26.10.2024, est. Minniti (ordinanza), ASGI (avv.ti Guariso e Randellini) e L’ALTRO DIRITTO (avv.ti Surace e Ventura) c. Comune di Arezzo (avv.ti Rulli e Pasquini) e Regione Toscana (avv.ta Neglia)
| |Discriminazione per nazionalità – graduatorie per l’accesso alla edilizia residenziale pubblica – legge regionale che attribuisce punteggi in base alla mera durata della residenza nell’ambito territoriale del bando – incoerenza con la funzione del servizio – possibile contrasto con l’art. 3 Cost. – possibile violazione dell’obbligo di parità di trattamento dei cittadini di paesi terzi previsto da diverse direttive UE – art. 117 Cost. - rilevanza e non manifesta infondatezza della questione di costituzionalità
Deve ritenersi rilevante e non manifestamente infondata la questione di costituzionalità dell’art. 10 L.R. Toscana n. 2/2019, nella parte in cui, mediante il richiamo all’allegato B, lettera C-1) prevede, per la formazione della graduatoria per l’accesso agli alloggi di edilizia residenziale pubblica, l’attribuzione di punteggi variabili da 1 a 4 in relazione alla mera residenza nell’ambito territoriale di riferimento del bando; tale attribuzione, prescindendo completamente dalla considerazione del bisogno, appare incoerente sia con la funzione del servizio e dunque in contrasto sia con l’art. 3 Cost., sia con gli obblighi di parità di trattamento nei confronti dei cittadini stranieri previsti dall’art. 24 della direttiva 2004/38 per i cittadini dell’Unione, dall’art. 11 della direttiva 2003/109 per gli stranieri lungosoggiornanti, dall’art. 12 della direttiva 2011/98 per i titolari di permesso unico lavoro, determinando una discriminazione non consentita nei confronti di tutti costoro.
Discrimination on grounds of nationality - rankings for access to public housing - regional law awarding points on the basis merely of length of residence in the area covered by the notice - inconsistency with the function of the service - possible conflict with Article 3 of the Constitution. - possible breach of the obligation of equal treatment of third-country nationals laid down by various EU directives - Article 117 of the Constitution. - relevance and not manifest groundlessness of the question of constitutionality.
The question of the constitutionality of Article 10 L.R. Toscana no.2/2019 is relevant and not manifestly unfounded, in so far as it provides, by means of reference to Annex B, letter C-1), for the establishment of the ranking list for access to public residential housing, for the allocation of scores varying from 1 to 4 in relation merely to residence in the territorial area of reference of the notice; such allocation, completely disregarding consideration of need, appears inconsistent both with the function of the service and therefore in conflict both with Article 3 of the Constitution and with the obligations of equal treatment in relation to foreign nationals laid down in Article 24 of Directive 2004/38 for citizens of the Union, Article 11 of Directive 2003/109 for long-term resident foreigners and Article 12 of Directive 2011/98 for holders of a single work permit, giving rise to discrimination which is not permitted in relation to all of them.
Discrimination on grounds of nationality - rankings for access to public housing - regional law awarding points on the basis merely of length of residence in the area covered by the notice - inconsistency with the function of the service - possible conflict with Article 3 of the Constitution. - possible breach of the obligation of equal treatment of third-country nationals laid down by various EU directives - Article 117 of the Constitution. - relevance and not manifest groundlessness of the question of constitutionality.
The question of the constitutionality of Article 10 L.R. Toscana no.2/2019 is relevant and not manifestly unfounded, in so far as it provides, by means of reference to Annex B, letter C-1), for the establishment of the ranking list for access to public residential housing, for the allocation of scores varying from 1 to 4 in relation merely to residence in the territorial area of reference of the notice; such allocation, completely disregarding consideration of need, appears inconsistent both with the function of the service and therefore in conflict both with Article 3 of the Constitution and with the obligations of equal treatment in relation to foreign nationals laid down in Article 24 of Directive 2004/38 for citizens of the Union, Article 11 of Directive 2003/109 for long-term resident foreigners and Article 12 of Directive 2011/98 for holders of a single work permit, giving rise to discrimination which is not permitted in relation to all of them.